OUkosher.org

Fish Products

Friday, September 11, 2009

Fish and Meat

The Gemara Pesachim (76b) teaches that one may not cook fish and meat together since this combination is considered a sakana. Shulchan Aruch (Y.D. 116:2-3) adds that one may not even eat meat after fish or fish after meat unless one eats and drinks in between1. Rama adds that one should not cook open meat and fish in the same oven because of raicha (aroma), though bidieved we say that raicha lav milsa. Magen Avrohom (O.C. 173:1) questions whether this sakana still exists today, however the minhag is still to be machmir.

Taz 116:2 says that fish cooked with meat is forbidden, even if the fish is batel b’shishim. Although issurim are batel b’shishim, since fish and meat is a sakana, we have no right to assume that it follows the same guidelines. “Chamira sakanta m’issura”.

However, Shach (Nikudas Hakesef) disagrees and maintains that fish is batel b’shishim in meat. This is the accepted opinion of most poskim. The Shevus Yaakov adds that since today it is questionable whether there exists any sakana (Magen Avrohom), one need not be machmir when there is shishim.

Therefore, products that contain amounts of fish that are not batel b’shishim must be labeled OU Fish, so that consumers will not unwittingly eat the product together with meat. If the amount of fish in the product is batel b’shishim, we do not require the product to be labeled OU Fish, provided that the fish ingredient is mentioned somewhere on the packaging. In this way, those who wish to be machmir for the opinion of Taz can do so by scanning the ingredient label. If the fish ingredient is not listed on the label or is ambiguous, (Omega-3 oil) then the product should be labeled OU Fish.

However, Rav Belsky said that if the product contains fish gelatin that is batel b’shishim then there is no need to label the product OU Fish even if it does not appear in the ingredients. For example, some flavors use fish gelatin as a carrier and would not be listed. If the amount of gelatin is batel b’shishim, there is no need to label the product OU Fish, even though fish is not listed on the packaging. Since fish gelatin is denatured and then refined, it is unclear whether there is any sakana for it to be eaten with meat. In this case, we need not be machmir provided it is batel b’shishim.

Although there is no chashash that dairy items will be eaten together with meat, still it is proper to label them OU Dairy Fish if the fish is not batel b’shishim to accommodate Sefardim that consider it a sakana to eat dairy and fish together.

It should be noted that though there is a sakana to eat meat and fish together, it is permissible to cook meat in fish kailim or to cook fish in meat kailim3. This is even true of a davar charif. For example an onion cut with a meat knife may be cooked together fish4. However, all of this is provided that the kailim are clean from all residue. It is not sufficient to merely wipe off a knife or spatula that was used for meat to then use it for fish, but rather it must be properly cleaned.

Summary: Because of the potential sakana of eating fish and meat together
• We must label foods OU Fish if they contain levels of fish that are not batel
• If the amount of fish is batel and it is listed on the ingredient panel then it need not be labeled OU Fish.
• Fish gelatin that is batel in a product need not be labeled OU Fish
• It is proper to label dairy items that contain fish OU Dairy Fish
• Although there is no sakana to cook fish with meat kailim, the kailim must be clean.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-
1. Shulchan Aruch also requires washing one’s hands between fish and meat, but Rama says that this is not necessary.
2. It is clear from the Poskim that discuss this issue that they are still concerned about sakana even today. However, the opinion of the Magen Avrohom is used as a mitigating factor when there are other reasons to be lenient (See Shevus Yaakov III:70 and Yad Efrayim Y.D. 116).
3. Issur V’heter brought by Taz Y.D. 116:2
4. Sefer Davar Charif 15:3

Posted by Leah Cooper on 09/11 at 09:51 AM
Fish ProductsMeat ProductsConsumer KosherPractical KashruthKosher ProfessionalsArticles • (3) Comments

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Mesorah Fish

On Sunday February 19th, the Orthodox Union presented a conference on a wide variety of subjects pertaining to Mesorah of various “pareve” subjects. The following is a look at the topic I presented, “An Analysis of Kaskeses – Part and Present”.

The first question one must address is the relationship between “kaskeses” and a kosher fish. What exactly defines a fish as kosher? The Pasuk in Vayikra 11:9 describes a kosher fish as one that has “snapir v’kaskeses”, which is generally translated as fins and scales. From the Pasuk alone, one might think that a fish needs to have both simanim in order to be kosher. However, the Mishnah in Niddah 59A (expounded in Chullin 66B) tells us, “kol sheyesh bo kaskeses yesh bo snapir”, that any fish which has “kaskeses” will automatically possess “snapir”. If so, we now see that in order for us to know if a fish is kosher, we simply need to confirm that it has “kaskeses”. The question remains, however, what exactly is “kaskeses”?

The Gemara goes through a back and forth discussion to confirm what exactly is a “snapir” and what is a “kaskeses”. The gemara concludes that “snapir” refers to a fin that assists a fish in swimming, and that “kaskeses” refers to those finger-nail like protrusions on the side of a fish. The gemara asks (in light of the knowledge that every fish possessing “kaskeses” automatically has “snapir”) what the was need for the pasuk to mention “snapir”. The Gemara responds, “Yagdil Torah V’Yadir”, that the pasuk mentions “snapir” in order to “make great” and “aggrandize” the Torah.

The question still remains, what exactly is “kaskeses”? Though it is often translated as “scales”, not all scales are included in the term “kaskeses”. Specifically, the Ramban in Chumash tells us that a “kaskeses” must be able to be removed from the fish either by hand or with a knife, without ripping the underlying skin. Practically speaking, if the scale underneath the skin would rip upon removing the scale, the fish could have “fins and scales”, but not have “snapir v’kaskeskes”, and would not be kosher. The Ramban’s requirement is discussed in the Achronim, but is universally accepted as the halacha (see Y.D.83:1, and Ramah there in the name of Maggid Mishnah).

No limit is given in the Poskim to discuss a particular shape, color or texture of a “kaskeses”. Any scale that can be removed without ripping skin would qualify as a “kaskeses”. The only limit discussed is the size of a scale, namely that it must be large enough to be viewed by the naked eye. Both the Aruch HaShulchan and the Tiferes Yisroel mention this requirement, on the grounds that a view at a normal distance by the naked eye is always the minimum limit specified by Torah Law for something to be legally significant.

The second question to address is how can we know if a particular fish is kosher? Many people believe one can determine a fish to be kosher based upon the scientific classification of the scales of a particular fish. There are five different types of scales: placoid, cosmoid, ganoid, ctenoid and cycloid. Placoid scales are found on many different types of sharks (sharks do have scales, though they rip the skin when removed and thus cannot be considered “kaskeses”), cosmoid are found on lungfish, ganoid are found on sturgeon, gars and bowfin. These three types of scales are rarely found on kosher fish, though I mentioned bowfin (Amia Calva) as at least one example of a kosher fish with ganoid scales. The other two types, cycloid and ctenoid scales, are the ones found on most kosher fish. The scale classifications are based on varying factors,such as the make upof the scale,its relationship to other scales on a fish, and the structure of the growth rings on the edge of a scale (experts can determine how old a fish is by counting rings on its scales, much as they would rings on a tree).

Some Rabbis have postulated that any fish bearing cycloid or ctenoid scales is a kosher fish. They would say that all one needs to do is confirm that a certain species of fish has one of these types of scales to know that it is kosher. There are several reasons why one should disagree with this assertion. One reason, mentioned above, is that some fish contain cycloid scales that are not visible to the naked eye. One example that we encountered in the OU office was a type of sandeel (Ammodytes Americanus) that supposedly had cycloid scales, though all the experts in our office who viewed samples could not see anything on the fish large enough to consider it as having “kaskeses”. Another reason why defining the type of scale is not sufficient to know if it is kosher, is that some fish have embedded scales. American Eel (Anguilla Anguilla) is known to have scales that could be “kosher” if not for the fact that they are deeply embedded into the skin. The same is true for burbot (Lota Lota). One must also bear in mind that there is nothing intrinsic to the definition of any type of scale that requires it be able to be removed from the fish without ripping the skin, as is required for “kaskeses”. Even if anecdotally one can note that a great number of fish bearing cycloid and ctenoid scales tend to have ones that that can qualify as “kaskeses”, one cannot claim that this would be a sufficient determinant of kosher status.

Others have suggested that some sort of kosher fish list be constructed for the benefit of consumers. There are several reasons why this suggestion is not viable. The first is the intrinsic inaccuracy of the use of common names. The same common name can be used to refer to a myriad of different fish. Not all “cods” are kosher; the burbot mentioned above is classified as a “gadidae”, technically making it a cod. In our office, we have encountered incidents with such fish as “torsk” (which can refer to both a kosher and a non-kosher fish), “escolar”(oilfish) which also refers to multiple specimens of varying kosher status, and Turbot (some are kosher, some not). Though the primary example of non-kosher (scaleless) Turbot is usually called “European Turbot”, the fish is actively produced through aquaculture (fish farming) in China and possibly other places. Let’s say for argument sake one could guarantee that a certain common name could refer to only one fish in the world. Surely then we could endorse such a fish list’s recommendation?

In truth, the consumer would be stuck with yet another concern, how does he know the sample he is trying to purchase in fact is the fish with this special common name? One cannot rely on someone who is not halachicly reliable to determine the status of a fish, which is exactly what a consumer who cannot determine the kosher status of a particular fish would be doing! For example, one cannot purchase “tilapia” based solely on the recommendation of a kosher fish list, if there is no way for him to verify that the fish in fact IS a tilapia.

Many cite the Orthodox Union’s renowned fish list, prepared by Dr. Atz. Surely one can purchase fish based on this list? Actually, Dr. Atz himself casts doubt upon the ability to identify a fish by common name. In an article he wrote for Tropical Fish Hobbyist in 1996, Dr. Atz chronicles the “Jewfish”. Dr. Atz shows how in different regions of the world from colonial times, almost every society had a “Jewfish”. Some were kosher, some were not. Dr. Atz concluded that the only thing the various fish had in common was that they were despised for some reason or another (and none was ever documented as having paid retail for anything). Common name is not a determinant.

The Kaf HaChaim also sees common names as inaccurate. In his Sefer (Yoreh Deah 83:5), he notes that discrepancies between different Talmudic accounts of the “shibbuta” must lead one to conclude that there were multiple fish called “shibutta” in the times of Chazal.

B’ezras Hashem, we will discuss in next week’s article how one would determine the kosher status of a fish, as well as a look at how the Talmudic rule of “kol sheyesh bo kaskeses yesh bo snapir” would be applied.
Posted by Leah Cooper on 12/17 at 12:11 PM
Fish ProductsConsumer KosherBehind the Scenes (Theoretical Kashruth)Kosher ProfessionalsArticles • (0) Comments

An Analysis of Kaskeses – Part and Present

To summarize, fish that have a kaskeses are kosher. The definition of kaskeses is unique to kashrus, and scientific classifications of scales are not halachikly determinative.

In this article, we will discuss two methods how to practically determine if a fish is kosher.

The easiest way to determine if a fish is kosher, is by manually checking the fish for scales. Simply locate a scale on the side of the fish (preferably behind the gills, tail or fin – as mentioned by the Rama as a chumra to guarantee the scale did not fall off of another fish), grab it between your thumb and forefinger, and gently attempt to pull it out. One should note that scales are always attached to the fish on the side closer to the head. The reason is fairly obvious if you can imagine how a fish swims. If the scale would be able to swing on the side closer to the tail, the current pulling against the now exposed scale would inevitably rip it off as the fish swims. This would be similar to the effect of when one walks with an umbrella in a brisk wind, and does not point it in the direction of the blowing. The umbrella gets caught in the wind and blows inside out. So too, the current would get caught under the scale and rip it off, causing the fish to die due to infection.

After removing the scale, simply inspect the area where the scale came from for a rip in the skin. If the skin seems fairly undamaged, the fish is kosher. If the scale will not come out without the skin ripping, the scale is not a “kaskeses”. Generally speaking, it is fairly obvious whether ir nit the scale ripped. As a practical “aytzah” to get a sense of what skin normally looks like when a “kaskeses” is removed (and the skin does not rip) would be to inspect the skin of other fish which one knows to be kosher.

Though there is no requirement of “mesorah” on fish like there is on birds and animals, the Darchei Teshuva does describe the possibility of determining the kosher status of a fish based on mesorah. Specifically, one may bring a fish (whose “kaskeses” fell off or did not yet grow “kaskeses”) to someone familiar with the specific fish to determine if this is a species that the person has mesorah of it being a kosher fish. It is important to keep in mind that the “mesorah method” of determining kosher status is particularly useful when dealing with various types of mackerel, for example, as mackerels tend to lose their scales when removed from the water. Fish that lose their scales may have a single scale in the three areas mentioned earlier (behind the gills, tail and fin), though without a scale one could still recognize the fish based on its skin.

As with most matters relating to the permitting of a potential Torah prohibition, the person ruling on the fish must be both “halachicly” reliable and familiar with the issue at hand (in our case, the specific type of fish). One should note that a gentile working at a fish store is not qualified to confirm the kosher status of the fish.

The “mesorah method” is based on an idea mentioned in last week’s article, namely that the Gemara tells us that a fish that has not yet grown “kaskeses” or lost its “kaskeskes” is still a kosher specie. One should ask, even if theoretically true, how could one practically determine that the fish is kosher if there are no “kaskeses” on it now? The answer, says the Darchei Teshuva, is that one can recognize the specie based on its skin. There is no mention of someone with a “tvias ayin” on the flesh of a fish, which must be regarded as “kirvei dagim” and is forbidden.

Some have asked how big a piece of skin must be left on the fish for one to determine its status based on the “mesorah method”. Though I have not seen a specific size given, clearly the piece of skin must be big enough for someone to actually be able to say what it is. A few weeks ago, I received an inquiry from a smaller hashgacha organization, that wanted to know how they could accept as kosher fish whose skin had been completely removed except for a small (scaleless) patch, when their mashgiach could not properly identify the fish. I answered that they could not. The only way to accept the fish is by having someone familiar with the specie accept the delivery, and a mashgiach who is not familiar with the specific fish is not acceptable. Consider the following mashul (parable). Suppose a person, r”l, is blind. Halachicly, the person is “ne’eman” to testify in Beis Din. One would not, however, ask the person to confirm which of two identical pieces of meat has a hashgacha printed on the package. Here too, a person who does not have mesorah on the particular fish in question may not be relied upon to confirm the kosher status of the fish by a patch of skin. Such a person could only attempt to remove a scale from the fish, as described above.

Some hashgacha organizations allow for salmon to be accepted without skin at all. The justification behind this policy is that there are no known fish whose flesh resembles the red/pink of a salmon, making the flesh color a “siman muvhak”. Again, this heter would only apply to a case where the mashgiach accepting the fish knows what a salmon is supposed to look like.

Many of us are “zoche” to live in areas where we don’t much think about which fish are kosher or not, as we could not imagine the local “heimish” supermarket selling a non-kosher species. Some of us live in parts of the world where kosher meat is difficult to acquire, and buying fish from the local store is the easiest way to properly feed our families. Though it may seem odd at first, those people have at least one advantage over their brethren living in Jewish neighborhoods. They have the chance to teach themselves and their children how to determine if a fish is kosher, often having no other option. It would be unfortunate if those of us who can easily acquire a kosher fish would lose out on the opportunity to know how to be “mavchin bein hatamei u’bein hatahor”, to be able to distinguish between the pure and the impure.
Posted by Leah Cooper on 12/17 at 12:07 PM
Fish ProductsConsumer KosherBehind the Scenes (Theoretical Kashruth)Kosher ProfessionalsArticles • (0) Comments

Monday, August 01, 2005

Nothing Fishy Here: Beyond the Four-Year Process at Ocean Nutrition to Make Fish Oil Kosher

The task of kosher certification for such an endeavor was not for the faint of heart
Those of us working in the field of kosher certification at the Orthodox Union have the distinct opportunity (and obligation) to be on top of new technologies, and new developments in food production. Long before Omega-3s were front-page news in the major media, the Orthodox Union received numerous inquiries into sources for kosher fish oil. The demand for kosher fish oil that could meet all standards made the opportunity for such a supplier obvious.

We were not the only ones who noticed the potential for high-quality kosher fish oil. The folks at Ocean Nutrition, in Nova Scotia, Canada, who were already committed to producing some of the highest quality fish oil on planet Earth, decided that they could be the ones to take advantage of this opportunity.

The task of kosher certification for such an endeavor was not for the faint of heart. Unlike most commercial productions, extensive preparations and planning were required before the Orthodox Union could even begin to discuss certifying an extracted fish oil product. Indeed, the Orthodox Union assigned one of its top Rabbinic Field Representatives to assist in the preliminary fieldwork required.

Rabbi Yaakov Blugrond, a 15-year veteran of the OU’s kosher certification division, is a world-renowned expert in the field of equipment kosherizations. Rabbi Blugrond saw the vast importance of this assignment, and turned it into a true labor of love. But even for the immensely capable rabbi, being a partner in the development of Ocean Nutrition’s fledgling kosher program was quite an assignment indeed, although as Rabbi Blugrond pointed out, ”Having a company as cooperative as Ocean Nutrition made the task a full 50 percent easier”.

Acting as the OU’s eyes and ears in the field, Rabbi Blugrond constantly relayed information about the practical workings of each Ocean Nutrition production phase to the office.This allowed our staff of Rabbinic Coordinators and Kashrus Law Consultants to construct the kosher program.

From the initial application until the OU issued a Letter of Certification for the finished product was a four-year period of perseverence and dedication. Under similar circumstances, one could imagine a company rethinking the value of continuing with the stringent requirements of kosher certification. For the folks at Ocean Nutrition, no obstacle is too great, and focus on the goal kept the process moving. Rabbi Amatzia Argentar, a Rabbinic Field Representative who assisted in production, commented, “Ocean Nutrition feels strongly that they are onto something very positive with OU kosher certification.”

Kosher oil production starts at an extraction facility in the various areas where menhaden, herrings and tunas are harvested. The OU requires that the extraction happen under on-site rabbinic supervision, confirming that the level of by-catch entering the extraction process is “absolute zero.” In addition, all oil made on this equipment prior to the rabbi’s arrival is regarded by the OU as non-kosher and requires a complete kosherization of the affected equipment. Prior to kosherization, the equipment must be perfectly clean, not a small order in an extraction facility whose most stringent CIP “is not good enough” for the rabbi.

Ocean Nutrition made it clear to every facility involved in the OU kosher production that the rabbi’s requirements must be fulfilled without a single compromise. Imagine the scene: every piece of production equipment, holding tank, pipe and belt… sparkling!

Next was the issue of identifying the kosher loads from the non-OU certified productions. For the on-site supervisor, a system of sealing containers (and kosherized equpiment) was arranged. For the producer, every line manager and shift director had to understand the changes to standard production that the OU requires. Every worker involved then had to be instructed in new production protocols in order to comply with the OU kosher program.Word quickly spread around the company,“Remember that no QC testing can take place unless the Rabbi opens the seals and reseals it afterwards!!”

Kosherized equipment has to remain sealed to guarentee that no nonkosher product is run on the equipment before the next kosher production; even changes in steam system piping cannot take place unless the rabbi approves it.

The raw extracted oil then travels through a semi-refining process, a refining process, and finally a spray-drying process. Each plant had another set of OU kosher protocols to be instituted, new production equipment which needed different forms of kosherization, a new set of workers who must be prepared for the needs of the new kosher regulations, and various other kosher challenges to rise up and meet. Throughout the process, all levels of Ocean Nutrition’s staff were singleminded in their commitment to the very strictest level of kosher supervision.

Ocean Nutrition invested considerable resources in meeting the OU’s requirements. Complete new systems had to be installed, including separate steam systems and dedicated reactors, and all of it had to be done in such a way as to guarantee that no crossover between kosher and non-kosher would occur.

In some cases, the OU requirements extended past the usual kosher program. In order to keep Rabbinic Field Representatives on-site for extended periods of time, the OU needed to have separate quarters set up for the rabbis, including a Succah (a type of ritual booth) during the duration of the September holiday and changes in production times to allow the rabbi to rest on the Sabbath.

In total, it took more than seven Rabbinic Field Representatives, in addition to Rabbi Blugrond’s field oversight, three Rabbinic Coordinators, and countless meetings between senior management and our in-house Kashrut Law Consultants to give the best kosher supervision to Ocean Nutritions products imaginable. As Rabbi Argentar put it, “Ocean Nutrition was very obliging in making sure the job was done well, to the mutual benefit of Ocean Nutrition and the kosher consumer.”

The word has spread, and manufacturers around the globe know the address for the highest quality kosher Omega 3 fish oil is Ocean Nutrition, under the proud and exacting kosher supervision of the Orthodox Union.

Posted by Malka on 08/01 at 10:50 AM
Fish ProductsOU Companies Speak • (0) Comments

The Health Benefits of Fish: Without the Fish

Now Kosher, MEG-3™ Brand Omega-3 Powder and Fish Oil Offer Food and Supplement Companies an Explosive Opportunity

OCEAN NUTRITION CANADA LTD. (ONC) isn’t just riding the Omega-3 ingredient wave; it is leading the way. Most people are not getting enough Omega-3 in their diets – 130mg per day on average compared to the American Heart Association’s recommendation of 500mg per day, and one gram for those with coronary heart disease (CHD). Now, with Ocean Nutrition Canada’s breakthrough microencapsulation technology and Orthodox Union kosher certification, all food manufacturers can add Omega-3 from fish to their products without altering the taste or smell.

Since its founding in 1997, ONC has grown into a leading researcher, innovator, and manufacturer of marine-based natural ingredients for the global healthy food and dietary supplement markets. Over the years, ONC, under the leadership of President Robert Orr, has developed a culture of excellence in all of its business practices, including research and development of new ingredients, manufacturing, regulatory affairs, quality assurance and control, marketing, and customer service.

Ocean Nutrition Canada is a leader in long chain Omega-3 EPA/DHA ingredients, with the world’s largest manufacturing capacity for fish oil concentrates. Only the finest sardine, anchovy, and mackerel fished in the deep waters off the coast of Peru are used in the manufacture of ONC’s MEG-3™ brand premium quality Omega-3 fish oil ingredients. ONC’s commitment to quality is evident by the fact that MEG-3™ fish oils are the first and, to date, only fish oil ingredients to achieve United States Pharmacopeia (USP) ingredient verification. To further build its reputation for excellence, ONC considered kosher certification for its MEG-3™ brand Omega-3 ingredients.

In 2002, Ocean Nutrition Canada made the strategic decision to pursue kosher certification. The purpose of this initiative was multifold: It would enable ONC’s Omega-3 ingredient to be available to the largest number of consumers; open up the kosher food market to MEG-3™ brand Omega-3 food ingredients; enable use of MEG-3™ ingredients in strictly kosher food manufacturing facilities; and provide added value to our customers.

Once the decision was made, ONC sought to achieve kosher certification in a manner consistent with its well-established tradition of excellence. Following extensive research into kosher certification options, including consultation with other industry-leading manufacturers, ONC made the decision to partner with the Orthodox Union, the most widely recognized and trusted kosher organization in the world. That decision proved to be very beneficial, according to Janet Shay, Vice President of Quality and Regulatory Affairs at ONC, who declared, “We are extremely pleased with the relationship we have built with the OU. Not only have they lived up to their exceptional reputation, they have exceeded our expectations and have been highly responsive and supportive throughout the entire process.”

The Orthodox Union rose to ONC’s challenge, which included not only certifying the fish oil plant in Mulgrave, Nova Scotia (N.S.) and the Omega-3 powder plant in Dartmouth, N.S., but also certifying the catch and extraction of oil from the fish in Peru. Rabbi Blugrond, Senior Field Supervisor, and the local rabbinic representative, were instrumental in the kosherization of the fish in Peru, which included supervising the fishing and sorting of the catch to ensure only sardine, anchovy, and mackerel (kosher species) were allowed into kosher vessels for the oil extraction process. The fish oil was then sealed by the rabbi and shipped to Nova Scotia for processing.

To meet the OU standard, some process changes and technological modifications were required in the manufacturing of the fish oil and powder. The Orthodox Union worked very closely with Ocean Nutrition Canada to ensure that these requirements were met. Rabbi Blugrond; Rabbi Goldberg, Rabbinic Coordinator; Rabbi Safran, Senior Rabbinic Coordinator; and Rabbi Rosen, Rabbinic Representative, worked diligently in partnership with ONC plant managers, regulatory and quality assurance managers, and staff to ensure that both manufacturing facilities in Nova Scotia, which also manufacture fish oil ingredients that are not kosher, met the strict OU kosher standard.

New Master Production Records (MPR) were developed to ensure compliance with OU requirements, the plants underwent a four month set-up period in preparation for running both kosher and non-kosher production lines simultaneously, and finally the kosher certification was completed. Behind the scenes, ONC’s regulatory affairs and quality assurance managers and staff worked tirelessly to coordinate with Rabbi Safran and Rabbi Goldberg to guarantee that ONC followed OU procedures and standards throughout the entire certification process.

Ocean Nutrition Canada looks forward to continuing to build upon the solid foundation it has established with the Orthodox Union and to taking the partnership to even greater heights as the Omega-3 market continues to grow exponentially. Several factors provide the basis for ONC’s enthusiasm about the future of Omega-3 market opportunities. These include: the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) qualified health claim issued in 2004 for reduced risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) for foods containing Omega-3 EPA/DHA; FDA issued a similar qualified health claim in 2000 for supplements containing Omega-3 EPA/DHA; and the American Heart Association (AHA) recognizes the health benefits of Omega-3 and recommends eating two fatty fish meals per week and, for those with CHD, consuming one gram of Omega-3 per day. All of these, in combination with extensive media exposure, are leading to increased consumer awareness of the health benefits of Omega-3 EPA/DHA.

ONC’s MEG-3™ brand Omega-3 powder is now in development with kosher food companies across a range of categories. The future of kosher MEG-3™ brand Omega-3 powder and fish oil ingredients is very bright and ONC welcomes the opportunity to continue to serve the healthy food and dietary supplement markets with premium quality Omega-3 ingredients.” This is an explosive opportunity for food manufacturers to provide a much-needed boost to consumers’ heart health,” said Michael Hodgett, Vice President of Business Development at ONC. “Now kosher food companies can deliver these health benefits too!”

Posted by Malka on 08/01 at 10:28 AM
Fish ProductsOU Companies SpeakCompany Profiles • (1) Comments

Wednesday, July 27, 2005

The Kashrus of Pickled Herring

Have you ever noticed that when herring is served at a kiddush or during shalosh seudos, not only does the herring not have fins or scales, it often doesn’t even have its telltale skin? What identifies the herring as kosher fish? The answer is, of course, that originally there was a skin on the herring, and fins and scales were there too. The story of how herring sheds its scales, and other kashrus events in the life of processed herring, are a bit unusual. It begins far off the coasts, deep in the night…

Our story begins far off the coasts, deep in the night. That’s when fishing for herring is done because that is when herring rise to the surface of the ocean to feed on rising phytoplankton, and they are therefore most accessible to the fishermen’s net. Using sophisticated sonar equipment, fishermen can locate herring even in the pitch black. After they have located the herring, fishermen can catch an entire school in one fall swoop using a traditional fishing method called “purse-seining.” A seine is a rectangular net with a sinker, or weighted bottom, on one long end of the net, and buoyant cork on the parallel end. The net is dropped vertically, and then drawn around the school like a curtain. A large boat holds one end of the net. A smaller boat, called a skiff, pulls the free end, wrapping the whole school of fish (see Figures). Next, a string at the bottom is pulled to lock in the catch, much like drawing the strings of an old-fashioned purse – and hence the name: purse-seining. While the net is slowly pulled onto the larger vessel, the fish are forced together towards the bottom. At this point the fish are either pumped onto the fishing boat directly from the net, or are removed by “brailing” – pulled out with small hand-held dip nets called brails.

Amazingly, most of the scales fall off the herring as they are being removed from the water. Most remaining scales are removed by fishermen using a process called vacuum harvesting. Even these shed scales have some economic value: fishermen sell them to cosmetic companies who grind them and use them in make-up!

By the time these fish are brought to the processing plant, they have almost no remaining scales. If a representative from the kosher certifying agency is not right there on the boat with the fishermen (which is not likely) how does the kosher certifying agency know that the fish are kosher? After all, the Torah requires that one identify kosher fish by their snapir v’kaskeses, fins and scales, and those scales are no longer present?

One answer can be found in comments from the Darchei Teshuva (Yorah Deah 83:1) who notes that, although scales may no longer be present on a fish, someone familiar with a kosher fish based on its skin can still identify that fish as kosher (a concept known as tevias ayin). This line of reasoning is accepted by the preponderance of kashrus agencies that certify herring. Other suggestions are also offered by Poskim for finding scales on a fish that apparently no longer possesses them. One can carefully check behind the gills, behind the fins (especially the dorsal fin), or by the tail, where one will likely find a remaining scale. Another suggestion is to wrap the fish in a cloth and check for scales in the cloth (Remah, Yorah Deah 83:1). These methods for identifying a fish are only applicable while the skin is still present. .

When the herring catch is brought to the processing facility, plant personnel remove any by-catch, which is the term used by the industry for species that were incidentally caught in the fishing process. Among the different species that can be found as by-catch are small sharks, and therefore it is the responsibility of the kashrus agency to monitor that one hundred percent of the non-kosher by-catch is removed.

Once sorted, the herring will be “dressed”, which has nothing to do with tznius! Dressing means the herring will have its head, viscera (guts), and tail removed. Often this process is done by machine, although some producers, especially smaller ones, still dress fish manually. If the dressing is done manually, the kashrus supervising agency must confirm that the workers do not take the knives used to dress the fish outside of the processing area. This is because of a concern that the workers might use their knives to cut, say, a delicious shark sandwich for lunch.

Much of the herring served these days is skinned herring. The processing facility removes the skins of the fish at this point, after the herring have been dressed.

Since kashrus agencies rely on the presence of the skin to identify herring as herring (following the Darchei Teshuva cited earlier) the fact that the skins are removed forces kashrus agencies to contend with the question of a skinless herring. In the language of chazal, skinless fish are called kirvei dagim (literally the inner part of fish). Kirvei dagim are assur d’rabonon (rabbinically prohibited) because of a chashash d’oraysoh (potential Torah prohibition) that the fish being represented as kosher is actually a dag tamay (non-kosher fish). Once the skin of the herring has been removed, how can one know that the fish is in fact a kosher herring?

Some agencies will simply require on-site supervision (hashgocho temidis) from the time the skin is removed. They would require the on-site supervisor to place a seal, or siman, on the containers holding semi-processed fish before he leaves the facility. He would also need to be present whenever the herring is being processed, until the product is bottled. Other agencies recognize the distinctive silver-blue flesh layer underneath the herring’s skin as being a siman muvhak (literally an absolute sign of identity). This opinion maintains that since no other fish shares this distinctive quality, merely having the silver-blue flesh layer is enough to guarantee the kosher status of the fish. Yet another opinion is to evaluate the nature of a manufacturing plant’s business. If the plant manufactures kosher fish exclusively, and has no financial benefit in trying to substitute a non-kosher fish for herring, an agency would certify all products made in the facility as kosher. The halachic justification for this opinion is based on the shas klal of u’man lo mareh umnaso (a professional does not wish to damage his reputation). These agencies require a mashgiach to be yotzei v’nichnas to confirm that the plant continues to produce kosher fish exclusively.

Additional concerns arise later in the processing, and will be treated in next week’s edition.

Part 2

Last week’s Kashrus Kaleidoscope dealt with the supervision of herring preparation until the herring is cut and skinned. The next step in processing of herring is called curing. Curing is, in layman’s language, the pickling stage. Salt, glacial acetic acid (a petroleum-based ingredient) and vinegar are used to preserve the herring (the saltiness of the salt and acidity of the glacial acetic acid or vinegar creates an environment hostile to bacteria, which are responsible for decay of foods). Besides preserving the herring, these ingredients help the herring taste better.

Although glacial acetic acid and salt are free of kashrus concerns, vinegar can be derived from non-kosher wine, and therefore it is necessary that a hashgacha has secured a kosher source of vinegar. Because most herring facilities receive vinegar in bulk shipments (in tanker trailers, for example), the kashrus agency must set up a protocol at the plant to guarantee that only properly certified and approved vinegar is received.

Herring is generally cured in barrels, and after the curing the process the barrels are sealed. For those agencies that require hashgacha temidis on the preliminary stages of the herring preparation process – the dressing, skinning, and curing steps – the rabbi who oversaw those steps would put a distinctive seal, or some other form of siman kashrus, on the barrels. When the barrels are opened, a rabbi must therefore be present to open the barrel as well and confirm that the seal is intact.

After the containers are opened, the herring is dumped into steel tanks where it is washed from the brine that it was pickled in. The washing process is called “desalting”. The tanks into which the herring is dumped must be used exclusively for kosher fish or has been koshered. The reason is that herring, before it is desalted, is a davar charif and therefore can rapidly pull out the bliyos of a container it is placed in. While normally bliyos are not transferred through “kvisha” in under 24 hours, dvarim charifim pull out bliyos in only minutes.

After the herring is washed, plant personnel will mix various brines, sauces, and spices into the herring before bottling. Herring in wine sauce is a fixture in the product line of herring companies, and the wine used in the wine sauce is the most sensitive of the ingredients used in this stage. Incidentally, the amount of wine used in herring in wine sauce is invariably minute. Usually, wine sauce really consists mostly of adding more of the petroleum-based glacial acetic acid that was also used in the original curing stage. Some herring companies use the same 750milliliter bottle of wine for months! Nevertheless, because non-kosher wine can easily be purchased, a hashgacha agency must see to it that only kosher wine is used.

Onions are used in most herring products. The people that cut the onions may be inclined to remove the knives from the production floor and use them for some other purpose. A system must obviously be in place to make sure that these knives are used exclusively under hashgacha. An additional kashrus consideration regarding peeled onions will B’EH be discussed in a future article

The tasty, well-preserved herring is finally ready to be pumped into the glass jars that we see in the market. The machine that pumps the herring into the jars is called a bottling machine, and it fills the jars with herring and brine to the absolute top of the jar. These filled-to-the-top jars move along a conveyor belt to a capping machine. The capping machine is a steel box with a conveyor belt running through it. A constant jet of steam shoots through the steel box. The force of the steam displaces a small amount of product brine before the machine applies caps to the jars.

The steam that is captured inside the jar cools rapidly and condenses to water. Steam occupies more space than water, and so the condensation of the steam to water has the effect of collapsing the space between the herring and the cap. That collapse pulls a safety button on the cap down and creates a vacuum seal.

Occasionally, the capper machine is splattered by the herring sauce that was displaced by the steam injection. Before a kosher herring run, or a pareve herring run after a dairy run (herring in cream sauce), it is critical that the capper be cleaned. There is a potential for non-kosher or dairy zeyah from the splattered residue to make its way into a kosher or pareve product. Some capping machines use a belt, instead of steam, to wipe off excess product from the top of each jar before capping. The belt must be confirmed to be clean between dairy to pareve or from non-kosher to kosher production runs.

One final step in the process must be considered. Herring is sealed in clear glass jars. These glass jars can contain non-kosher product. A kashrus agency must set up systems to guarantee that a label bearing its kashrus symbol is used for certified product only. If there is any concern about mislabeling in a facility, an on-site mashgiach will control the usage of the label until the kosher production is over. He will collect any unused labels and remove them from the facility or leave them at the facility only when secured under a special seal.

So, while you’re enjoying the wine sauce, cream sauce, or just the traditional herring in onions, remember to appreciate the complexities that herring presents and the measures taken to guarantee that it is kosher.

Halachic Insights/Fish FAQs

Q: How do we identify a kosher fish?
A: The Torah1 says that the simanim of kosher fish are “snapir v’ kaskeses”. However the Gemara2 tells us that all fish that have “kaskeses” have “snapir”, so in practice, all one needs to determine that a fish is kosher is that it has kaskeses!
Q: So what exactly is kaskeses?
A: “Kaskeses” is generally translated as scales. Nonetheless, not all scales are considered kaskeses. This is because the Ramban, in his commentary on the Torah3 tells us “kaskesesare scales that can be easily removed by hand or with a knife without tearing the skin. Scales that are embedded in a fish (or are not visible to the naked eye4) are not “kaskeses”. The Ramban’s definition is universally accepted, and in fact the Rema5 rules that those scales that cannot be easily removed (according to the parameters that will be discussed below) cannot be called “kaskeses”.
Q: I heard there a several different scientific classifications of scales. Which are kaskeses?
A: Though scientists categorize scales by certain characteristics, the Torah is only concerned with whether or not a scale can be easily removed without tearing the skin, irrespective of its shape, color or size6. From the Torah’s perspective, the various scientific classifications of scales are irrelevant.
Q: What are some examples of fish with scales that are not kosher?
A: Sturgeon definitely has scales7 , but it is not kosher. Its scales are classified as “ganoid”, which means that they are covered with ganoin (similar in texture to fingernails) and cannot be removed without tearing the skin. Burbot has cycloid scales (one of the types often referred to as “always kosher” ) yet because they are embedded, this fish is not kosher. Sand lances may have tiny scales, but since they are not visible, this fish is not kosher.
Q: How can I know if a fish is kosher?
A: To check if a fish is kosher, one must ascertain that its scales could be properly removed8. Scales are attached on the side to the fish on that side of the scale which is closer to the head and are not attached on the other side of the scale which is closer to the tail. To remove the scales, one must grasp that side that is not attached and gently pluck it off from the side of the fish9. If removing the scale did not damage the skin, then the fish is kosher.
Q: My local fish store is not under Rabbinic supervision, and it sells fillets without skin. How could I tell if the fish they are selling are kosher?
A: You cannot! Even if the fish is halibut, whitefish or carp (all kosher fish), once the skin is removed it is impossible to identify, and it cannot be assumed to be kosher. In determining the kosher status of fish, identifying the species is critical.

There are two ways to identify a kosher fish:
1) By removing a kosher scale from the skin10.
2) By recognizing the fish as being from a kosher species. One can only recognize a fish species if the skin is still intact. It is generally impossible, even for a “maven”, to identify fish without skin. The exception to this rule is that the Orthodox Union accepts salmon and red trout fillets without skin, as there is no non-kosher fish whose flesh resembles that of a salmon or red trout.

For example, let us say that you want to purchase tilapia11. You heard that tilapia is a kosher fish, and the friendly counterperson assures you this scale-less fillet is tilapia. You simply cannot rely on this person, unless he is both observant in Torah and mitzvos and is familiar with the laws of kosher fish. Now let us say that a tilapia-eating friend (who is halachically reliable) comes to the store with you and recognizes a fish in the display case whose scales have been removed (but the skin is still intact) as tilapia. Even though its scales are not present, you may eat this fish because a halachicly reliable person has positively identified it as kosher. Therefore, one can only purchase skinless fillets from a store under reliable Rabbinic supervision.
Q: What if only a patch of the skin is left on a fillet?
A: If you can have someone (halachicly reliable) confirm the identity of a fish based on a patch of skin, this would be sufficient.
Q: Why is it so difficult to publish an accurate kosher fish list?
A: The reason is that “common names” are a highly inaccurate way of describing a fish. For example, there are several fish known as “red snapper”. Who can say for certain that every fish called “red snapper” is in fact kosher, when “red snapper” could be referring to so many different fish? Another instance that we have found common names to be misleading is in the case of “Escolar”. Escolar could refer to Ruvettus pretiosus (kosher) or Gempylus serpens (non-kosher). Yet another is “Ling” which could refer to 6 different species of fish most of which are in fact kosher. However when the OU examined a sample of one of these “Ling” fish whose Latin name is Lota Lota (also called Burbot, Freshwater Cod, Eelpout, Lawyer and other names) we found it to be not kosher.

Latin names are more accurate. It would be possible to create a list of kosher fish by Latin name. The problem is that fish sellers never refer to fish by Latin names, and have generally no knowledge of the correct Latin name for a fish! In one case, we asked a kosher fish store the Latin name of a certain (kosher) fish and the Latin name provided was that of a completely different, non-kosher fish!!!

Though your mother was right, and you should not judge a book by its cover, you should most certainly judge a kosher fish by its cover… its scales and identifying skin!

The Halachic Insights was reprinted from a longer article published in The Daf HaKashrus, the OU’s newsletter for Mashgichim.

1 Vayikra 11:9.

2 Chullin 66b.

3 Vayikra 11:9.

4 Aruch HaShulchan 83:15.

5 Yoreh Deah 83:1

6 Rabbi Y. Ephrati wrote this in the name of Rabbi Y. Elyashiv in a Teshuva dated the 11th of Elul, 5763).

7 More precisely scutes, which are technically defined as “enlarged scales often containing one or more bony projections.” See Peterson’s Field Guides Freshwater Fishes, 1991, Drs. Lawrence Paige and Brooks Burr.

8 Teshuvos She’vas Tzion #29 cited by Pischei Teshuva 83:1, states that it is necessary to actually remove the scales and not merely rely on the rov (i.e. majority) that most scales are easily removed.

9 I have not found this procedure explicitly, though this is simply the way to check the kosher status of a fish. Though the Nodah B’yehudah permitted a fish similar to sturgeon whose scales became removable only by soaking it in an alkaline solution, the Pischei Teshuva rules like the Teshuvos She’vas Tzion (cited above) who does not allow it.

10 The consumer need not personally remove the scale. The consumer only needs to see the scale removed and that the skin did not rip from having the scale removed. He must additionally be sure that the scale being removed was in fact attached to the fish before removal (and not that it was actually a scale from another fish which merely was stuck to this fish.)

11 The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA” ) officially lists 7 different tilapia that are marketed in the U.S, though there may be more. It is not possible for the Orthodox Union to ascertain that all species of tilapia are kosher.

Posted by Malka on 07/27 at 11:29 AM
Fish ProductsConsumer KosherBehind the Scenes (Theoretical Kashruth)Kosher in the Factory • (0) Comments

Monday, April 04, 2005

Is There a Doctor in the House? Dr. Praeger is on Call, During the Year and at Passover

Dr. Peter Praeger of Dr. Praeger’s, the famous fish company, is a real person and a real doctor, a cardiologist. In a strange but true story, that’s how he became involved with the firm.

When the company was known as Ungar’s Gefilte Fish Corp., Dr. Praeger, of Hackensack University Medical Center (NJ), was called on to treat the brother-in-law of Rubin Ungar, the company president, following a tragic accident. Dr. Praeger saved the man’s life. A few years later, Dr. Praeger was brought in to save a struggling company. Showing the same kind of skills he demonstrated in medicine, he resuscitated the firm, working with Dr. Eric Somberg and their wives and children. Early on, Nurit Praeger, Peter’s wife, started selling gefilte fish for the company. On a sales call to Yeshiva University, she asked the food service manager which products were popular so that she could advise Peter to produce them. The manager suggested veggie burgers; Peter went to his lab and started to develop a delicious version that became a huge success. The manager also suggested broccoli and
spinach pancakes, along with potato latkes. More successes, a growing firm and a move to new and larger quarters.

The company continues to grow by leaps and bounds. Contributing to its success was Peter’s determination, as a heart surgeon, to create healthy products, many of which are approved by the American Heart Association.

Another major factor in the firm’s growth was its affiliation with the Orthodox Union. Dr. Praeger’s specifically chose the OU because of the tremendous benefit of associating with the world’s must respected kosher certification. Over the years, the OU has been a great partner with the company.

Passover brings special treats from Dr. Praeger’s, including gefilte fish, made with fresh fish; potato crusted fish sticks and fish fillets; and broccoli, potato and spinach pancakes.All products are natural, just what you would expect from a cardiologist. For more information, check out the company’s website, www.drpraeger.com.

Posted by Malka on 04/04 at 04:48 PM
Fish ProductsOU Companies SpeakCompany Profiles • (4) Comments

Ocean Beauty: Some Beautiful Fish


Ocean Beauty Seafoods was founded in the early 1900’s and is one the largest seafood companies in the United States. Headquartered in Seattle, Ocean Beauty is the parent company for the largest smokehouse group in North America. There are four smokehouses, with locations in Boston, the Seattle area, and Los Angeles. Key brands produced and marketed by Ocean Beauty include LASCCO, Nathan’s, Rite, Echo Falls, Three Star and Ian McTavish. Brands available with Passover certification include LASCCO,Three Star, Nathan’s and Rite. Herring in wine, herring in cream and Nova Smoked salmon are the primary products available.

Posted by Malka on 04/04 at 04:37 PM
Fish ProductsOU Companies SpeakCompany Profiles • (0) Comments

Bumble Bee Seafoods Offers Prime Fillet Kosher for Passover Solid White Albacore


Maintaining the tradition of excellence it first established over 100 years ago continues to be an important priority for Bumble Bee Seafoods. From the company’s origins with seven fishermen who banded together to found the business in Astoria, Oregon in 1899, to its position today as one of North America’s top branded seafood and protein food companies, Bumble Bee is recognized as an industry leader in quality and innovation. As a testament to the quality and value of the Bumble Bee brand, many of the company’s products proudly bear the OU symbol. This year, Bumble Bee is honoring Passover with a special limited-edition Kosher for Passover Prime Fillet Solid White Albacore. Bumble Bee Prime Fillet is a superior tuna product consisting of the finest grade of hand-selected solid white albacore packed only in water. Prime Fillet is Bumble Bee’s premium label and the line of Prime Fillet products is the highest quality selection produced by the company. While all Bumble Bee canned tuna
carries the OU symbol, this special limited run of Bumble Bee Prime Fillet has been processed under the direct supervision of the Orthodox Union to meet the special standards of Jewish dietary law relating to Passover. This premium product is packaged with a unique high gloss gold-foil label that makes it a stand-out on grocery shelves. The label carries the OUP symbol, as well as graphic bursts on the top and sides, informing consumers that the product is Kosher for Passover. It will be available beginning February 28, 2005 in a 24-pack case, as well as a 72-unit display stand, featuring special Kosher for Passover header signage on top. Bumble Bee President and Chief Executive Officer Christopher Lischewski declared:“At Bumble Bee,we’re proud of our long-standing relationship with the OU, and that our products carry the OU’s symbol as an important measure of quality. We’re also delighted to be able to work with the OU in providing high quality kosher products to our consumers such as our Prime Fillet Kosher for Passover Solid White Albacore.”

Posted by Malka on 04/04 at 04:33 PM
Fish ProductsOU Companies SpeakCompany Profiles • (0) Comments
Page 1 of 1 pages